Net metering by state, and what it is actually worth

A solar array generates most of its power while you are out. Whatever you do not use on the spot goes to the grid, and what the grid pays for it is the single most under-examined number in a solar quote. Across the 50 states we model, it ranges from the full retail price down to under a quarter of it.

Why the percentage is not the whole story

A low export rate hurts in proportion to the price of the electricity it is a fraction of. That is why the table below also gives the penalty in dollars: the same 25% credit costs a California household far more than it would cost a Utah one, because California's retail rate is more than twice as high. On our reference case the worst is Ohio, at $1,202 a year.

Every state we model, ranked by export credit

Modelled on a household spending $200 a month on electricity, with the array sized to cover its usage. The dollar column is the yearly gap between what your exported power would be worth on your own bill and what the utility actually credits it at — so it grows with both a worse export rate and a higher retail price.

State Exports earn Retail rate Cost of the gap Rule
Florida 100% of retail $0.152 Full retail net metering for investor-owned utilities.
Massachusetts 100% of retail $0.288 Net metering plus SMART performance payments.
New York 100% of retail $0.299 Value Stack / net metering depending on utility and system size.
New Jersey 100% of retail $0.233 Net metering plus SREC-II performance payments.
Illinois 100% of retail $0.239 Net metering plus Illinois Shines REC payments.
North Carolina 100% of retail $0.151 Duke’s Net Metering Bridge Rate credits exports at retail — but it closes to new applicants on 31 December 2026.
Colorado 100% of retail $0.162 Full retail net metering; only a year-end surplus is bought out at avoided cost.
Maryland 100% of retail $0.218 Full retail net metering, with an SREC market on top that we do not model.
Pennsylvania 100% of retail $0.216 Net metering at retail; only the surplus left at the end of the 12-month cycle is bought out at the price-to-compare.
Connecticut 100% of retail $0.274 RRES credits exports at retail, but 2026 enrollees pay a 4.02¢/kWh Solar Energy Adjustment on everything they generate.
Rhode Island 100% of retail $0.295 Net metering at retail, against one of the highest electricity prices in the country.
Washington 100% of retail $0.150 Net metering at retail — but on the cheapest power and the least sunlight of any state we model.
Oregon 100% of retail $0.163 Net metering at retail, with unused credits zeroed out annually rather than paid.
Minnesota 100% of retail $0.170 Net metering at retail for systems up to 40 kW.
Virginia 100% of retail $0.176 Net metering at retail, with a standby charge for larger residential systems that we do not model.
South Carolina 100% of retail $0.162 Net metering at retail under Act 62, alongside the largest state tax credit in the country.
New Mexico 100% of retail $0.141 Net metering at retail, on very high sunlight and a modest retail price.
Maine 100% of retail $0.286 Net Energy Billing credits rooftop exports at the full retail rate; the 2023 reforms changed community solar, not rooftop.
Delaware 100% of retail $0.194 Full retail net metering, among the stronger programmes in the country.
West Virginia 100% of retail $0.168 Full retail net metering.
Wisconsin 100% of retail $0.197 Net metering at retail, though terms are set utility by utility rather than statewide.
Iowa 100% of retail $0.141 Net metering at retail for the investor-owned utilities.
Missouri 100% of retail $0.137 Net metering at retail under the Easy Connection Act, for systems up to 100 kW.
Kansas 100% of retail $0.151 Net metering at retail within the billing period; any surplus left at the end of it is not carried forward.
Nebraska 100% of retail $0.136 Net metering at retail for systems up to 25 kW, across a wholly publicly owned utility sector.
North Dakota 100% of retail $0.136 Net metering at retail, with terms varying by utility.
Montana 100% of retail $0.147 Net metering at retail for systems up to 50 kW.
Oklahoma 100% of retail $0.134 Generation is netted against consumption at the retail energy rate within each billing period; several co-ops do not participate.
Arkansas 100% of retail $0.144 Residential net metering still nets at retail, but the framework has been reopened repeatedly since Act 464 — confirm the current terms before signing.
Wyoming 100% of retail $0.148 Net metering at retail for systems up to 25 kW.
New Hampshire 85% of retail $0.273 $234/yr NEM 2.0 pays supply plus transmission but only 25% of distribution — about 85% of retail, locked to 2041.
Vermont 78% of retail $0.249 $343/yr A siting adjustor set by the Public Utility Commission has been cut every year since 2019; a generated kWh now offsets roughly 75–80% of a consumed one.
Arizona 75% of retail $0.152 $390/yr Export compensation set annually by the Corporation Commission.
Nevada 75% of retail $0.136 $391/yr Excess energy credited at 75% of retail after monthly netting, locked for 20 years from installation.
Texas 60% of retail $0.164 $624/yr Buyback varies by retail provider; no statewide net metering mandate.
Idaho 60% of retail $0.124 $622/yr No statewide mandate; Idaho Power replaced one-for-one netting with an export credit rate worth well under retail.
Michigan 55% of retail $0.220 $705/yr The distributed generation tariff pays an outflow credit equal to the power supply portion of retail, not the whole bill.
Georgia 46% of retail $0.158 $844/yr Instantaneous netting under RNR-11; the 1:1 monthly-netting pilot filled its 5,000-customer cap and is closed.
South Dakota 40% of retail $0.157 $933/yr One of the few states with no net metering mandate at all; compensation is whatever the utility offers, typically avoided cost.
Mississippi 40% of retail $0.162 $934/yr Net metering in name only: exports earn avoided cost plus a small adder rather than the retail rate.
Utah 39% of retail $0.130 $952/yr Net billing under Rocky Mountain Power’s Schedule 136: exports earn about 5.6¢ in summer and 4.7¢ the rest of the year.
Hawaii 38% of retail $0.520 $951/yr Net metering closed in 2015; grid-supply programmes credit exports at a fixed rate far below retail.
Alaska 35% of retail $0.282 $1,011/yr Exports are credited at the utility’s non-firm avoided cost, far below retail.
Tennessee 35% of retail $0.145 $1,014/yr No statewide net metering; TVA’s programme pays an avoided-cost rate around 4–5 cents against retail near 12–14.
Louisiana 35% of retail $0.142 $1,015/yr Retail net metering closed to new customers in 2019; exports earn avoided cost, and the Commission has proceedings open that may change this again.
Alabama 30% of retail $0.168 $1,094/yr No net metering mandate. Alabama Power buys exports at avoided cost and additionally levies a monthly capacity charge on solar customers.
Kentucky 30% of retail $0.150 $1,088/yr Net metering has effectively ended for new installations; new interconnections are compensated near avoided cost.
California 25% of retail $0.333 $1,179/yr NEM 3.0 compensates exports at avoided-cost rates far below retail.
Indiana 24% of retail $0.182 $1,181/yr Net metering closed to new customers in July 2022; excess generation now earns the prior year’s average wholesale price plus 25%.
Ohio 23% of retail $0.195 $1,202/yr Exports earn only the generation component of your rate — roughly 4–5¢ against a retail price near 20¢.

The four regimes

Full retail net metering — 30 of 50 states

Florida, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Illinois, North Carolina, Colorado, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Washington, Oregon, Minnesota, Virginia, South Carolina, New Mexico, Maine, Delaware, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Iowa, Missouri, Kansas, Nebraska, North Dakota, Montana, Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Wyoming still credit an exported kilowatt-hour at the same price they charge for one. Your meter effectively runs backwards. This is the most favourable treatment available and it is what almost every online solar calculator silently assumes for everybody.

It is also the arrangement utilities lobby hardest to end, and the trend only runs one way. A 25-year model resting on full retail net metering is making a policy forecast, not just a financial one.

Partial credit — 7 states

New Hampshire, Vermont, Arizona, Nevada, Texas, Idaho, and Michigan pay a defined fraction of retail. Nevada's 75% is locked for 20 years from installation, which is a genuine guarantee; most are set by regulators and can move.

Avoided cost or wholesale-linked — 13 states

Georgia, South Dakota, Mississippi, Utah, Hawaii, Alaska, Tennessee, Louisiana, Alabama, Kentucky, California, Indiana, and Ohio pay something closer to what the utility would have paid a power plant. The label “net metering” often survives in these states even though the economics have been gutted — Ohio credits only the generation component of your tariff, Indiana closed net metering to new customers in 2022, and California's NEM 3.0 pays avoided-cost rates against the second-highest retail price in the country.

In this group, self-consumption stops being an optimisation and becomes the whole strategy. Shifting laundry, dishwashing, EV charging and heat pump run-time into daylight converts a cheap exported kilowatt-hour into an expensive avoided one. A battery does the same thing with hardware, and this is the only group where one can pay for itself — see the battery calculator.

Retail credit with a charge on top — 1 state

Connecticut belongs in its own category, and it is the one to watch. Exports are credited at full retail, which reads well in a summary, but a separate charge is levied on everything the array generates — $0.040/kWh in Connecticut . A comparison that only looks at the export percentage will read this as a top-tier state. We model the charge directly, which is why Connecticut sits lower in our ranking than its electricity price alone would suggest.

What to ask before you sign

Sunlight and rate figures come from NREL PVWatts v8 and EIA; every state record carries its own provenance on the data sources page, and the modelling assumptions are on the methodology page.